bonsaiTALK Community  

Go Back   bonsaiTALK Community > Main > Students of Bonsai > Tree of the Day
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Forum Gallery Weather Journals Links Webring Wiki NEW:Shop
Articles Opinion T.O.D. NEW:Radio Contests Humor NEW: Auctions! Donate


Tree of the Day - Wednesday April 27, 2005

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
bonsaiTALK Hint: Did you know you can double click any bonsai term on this page for its definition?
Old 27-Apr-2005   #11
John Dixon
Air Assault All The Way.
John Dixon's a bonsaiTALK supporter! Click Here to find out how you can be one too!
 
John Dixon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar-2004
Location: Huntersville, NC (near Charlotte)
Country: USA
Posts: 1,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sterling
Ok so I'm probably the most novice of the novices but I wanted to comment on this selection and see what everyone else thought of my comments. I really like the canopy of this grove. It's gentle and pleasing to the eye. The trunks of the trees however do not seem to me to allow for this canopy to exist. My major problem is with the second trunk from the left. All the other trunks are leaning at approximately a 60 degree angle except for this trunk. Why did this trunk not only grow straight up, but then turn away from the other trunks. I have a problem with the shari on this trunk as well. The shari extends above the point of crossing with the other trunk. How did this tree lose it's bark in this area while the tree right next to it suffered no ill effect? I'm sure that the grove loses somthing in the translation to two dimensions but the crossing lines of the left two trunks catches the eye too much. In my most humble opinion, it detracts from the beautiful styling job in the canopy. My question is why?


Sterling,

I am in agreement with your assessment. I respect the opinions of others on this bonsai, but the chaotic nature of the design cannot be explained, it just "is". Your remarks about the sharied trunk are especially profound. The slender trunk "in front" on the shari breaks it up, and nullifies the expression that the shari should provide. Granted, everything I have mentioned could have occurred in nature, but why would you seek to employ those points if they aren't necessary?

One post remarked that the author felt the artist intentionally used the crossing trunks and grouping of four to portray their idea. My question is "why" to that. If you are trying to see if your can make four trunks work instead of three or five and not design a symetrical shape, okay, I can live with that, but if the same design can be done in a more superior way with three or five, why do it with four? It seems like some are more apt to want to intentionally stray from "standardized" methods than others. When the change results in a positive increase of design, I say well done. When it doesn't substantially add or even lowers the value of the design, I do not see the logic in that philosophy.

In my humble opinion, this forest does not improve with the high crossing "X" and the total of four trees. I am glad that others do find substance in this approach, but I am not in league with that membership.

Sterling, I believe that you have made some very valid observations.

John
__________________
John Dixon

Si vis pacem parabellum

Stay off the trails of others, that's where the booby-traps are.
John Dixon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sponsor Message Tree of the Day - Wednesday April 27, 2005
Advertisement
Forum Sponsor
Old 27-Apr-2005   #12
mike_p
bonsaiTALK ArchMaster
mike_p's a bonsaiTALK supporter! Click Here to find out how you can be one too!
 
mike_p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep-2004
Location: South San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,028
Is this Hamlet's tree? I hear it now: "To X or not to X, that is the question".
With apologies to W. Shakespeare.

Mike
__________________
Bonsai is not a hobby.
Bonsai is a way of life.
MP@BBB Studio

There is no way to happiness. Happiness is the way
Gautama Buddha
mike_p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Apr-2005   #13
EarthgirlOK
bonsaiTALK Master Craftsman
 
EarthgirlOK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep-2004
Location: Bartlesville OK
Country: USA
Posts: 839
I agree with everyone who has said that this tree is visually stunning. At first. But then, the eye gets a little lost (I think). I do like the lush canopy, but it bothers me a little how exaggerated the lean in the trunks is in comparison. Windswept trees aren't quite as full (at least not where I'm from ), and certainly don't generally have rounded puffs of foliage, a minor weakness it this group. The other thing that is out of kilter to me is the tree second from left that seems to be growing the wrong direction: why would all the other trees be windblown and not this one? To me, this one tree upsets the harmony of the rest.

Now, if the artist was shooting for discord, that's fine, but perhaps the overall canopy should not form one harmonious shape...

I think this is a raft planting, and if it is, repositioning everything is a mute point.

But if it isn't, I'd like to see things opened up a bit and tidied up a little. Less is more here, I think.

The problem with my idea for this group is that once you make the changes I have proposed, you lose much of the immediate and visceral effect.

I'm also not crazy about the overall canopy shape I came up with. In the original picture, and in my virt, I am really bothered by a confusing muddle of branches and foliage; it's hard to see what's actually going on there sort of in the center of the canopy. I'd like to see that cleaned up a bit, but I didn't take it on.

Of course, I think Walter's slab idea was on the money.

This, to me, is one of those examples where you'd either want make one or two big changes, or completely leave it alone and enjoy it the way it is.

I would like to have this on my shelves to think about.

As I look at this group, I doubt I would actually do very much to it, but it would be a tree I would ponder alot.

Thanks Matt for the challenge!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tod 4.27.jpg (26.5 KB, 27 views)
EarthgirlOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Apr-2005   #14
rockm
bonsaiTALK ArchMaster
 
Join Date: Oct-2003
Location: Fairfax, Va
Country: USA
Posts: 4,561
I think the point of this entire planting ARE the crossed trunks, the inherent conflict and tension (and resulting scars resulting from the friction) between the trees. The smaller container, I think, is meant to specifically focus on that conflict rather than the rather wide plain vanilla canopy. The shari and cross appear roughtly at "centerstage" in the container. The larger virtual slab-based landscape portrayal minimizes the trunks to the extent the cross becomes an afterthought, and instead emphasizes the movement of the canopy.

I think this planting has a message--at least it does for me--that although conflict is natural, it can also be painful and leave scars.
rockm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Apr-2005   #15
Lee
bonsaiTALK Expert
 
Join Date: Aug-2004
Country: uk
Posts: 169
How to critique a tree---Start at the base work up the trunk line(or lines) and come back down with the foliage.Try it with this one,that crossing trunk just aint doing a thing for me,I cannot follow the line,so pass me the cutters
Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Apr-2005   #16
bonsaikc
Registered FedEx Sender
bonsaikc's a bonsaiTALK supporter! Click Here to find out how you can be one too!
 
bonsaikc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan-2004
Location: Ottawa, KS
Country: USA
Posts: 1,730
I am not opposed to crossed trunks in forest plantings. On the contrary, I find that it lends a naturalness to the planting that is refreshing. On this tree, however, I believe the crossing trunk to be too far at odds with the composition. The canopy should be ordered better and arranged into layers, but not necessarily thinned out except to promote the thicker growth. I like the slab idea so I incorporated Walter's virt. slab.

Chris Johnston
Attached Images
File Type: jpg TOD_27APR20052virt.JPG (42.9 KB, 17 views)
__________________
Sashi-no-eda.blogspot.com

bonsaikc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Apr-2005   #17
pootsie
The Cat's Apprentice
pootsie's a bonsaiTALK supporter! Click Here to find out how you can be one too!
 
pootsie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May-2004
Location: Columbus o-HI-o
Country: USofA
Posts: 3,065
I am all at odds about this tree and don't know what to think.

Hmmm, how about what I feel? Mixed feelings. This presentation is a challenging one, but over all I don't "feel" much interest in it.

Great to see this discussion tho' -- three more cheers for Treebay!

pootsie
__________________
p.s. My cat is a bonsaiTALK Master.
Columbus Bonsai Society
pootsie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Apr-2005   #18
Ian_Homer
Square Tree - Round Pot!
Ian_Homer's a bonsaiTALK supporter! Click Here to find out how you can be one too!
 
Ian_Homer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May-2004
Location: Walsall U.K.
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,477
Click Here to Skype Ian_Homer
Hi All,

Well, I have to say I see Pootsies point on this one. Something is not quite right and I have looked at this composition several times during the day. Only now, have I seen what I am not happy with.

I love Walters virtual. It is an informal group, so the slab works perfectly. But that straight trunk is not complimentary to the overall design.

My rough variation on Walters virt, puts some curve into that straight trunk, while I would also try to move it to the back, behind the trunk with the shari.

This looks better. (imo) What do YOU think ?

Ian.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg AMMENDEDGROVE.jpg (69.8 KB, 24 views)
__________________
help save The Vulcan...
Return to Flight
Ian_Homer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Apr-2005   #19
TreeBay
Tips:5¢ Advice:Free
TreeBay's a bonsaiTALK supporter! Click Here to find out how you can be one too!
 
TreeBay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug-2001
Location: Silicon Valley
Country: USA
Posts: 9,745
Send a message via AIM to TreeBay Click Here to Skype TreeBay
This design is masculine, with hard edges and fast movement. Adding soft movement dulls the impact of trunks the crossing trunks. That conflict is, in my opinion, the heart of the composition. If movement is introduced it needs to be in keeping with the angular character of the trunklines and should not disrupt the dynamic character of the piece.

However, removing that conflicting design element entirely is a little like taking the "fight scene" out of an action movie. If it's any good the movie will have some other redeeming points, but it isn't a positive step if the result is bland.

Regards,

Matt
__________________
Want to be a seller on bonsaiAUCTIONS? Get authorized today!
bonsaiTALK: Over 100,005.36 Megabytes Served this Month!
TreeBay is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Fine Line Of "Natural Vs. Classical" bonsaial1 Opinion 34 27-Apr-2006 11:03 PM
Tree of the Day - Friday, April 22, 2005 TreeBay Tree of the Day 10 22-Apr-2005 04:12 PM
Tree of the Day - Tuesday April 5, 2005 TreeBay Tree of the Day 10 5-Apr-2005 11:16 PM
Tree of the Day - Monday April 4, 2005 TreeBay Tree of the Day 5 4-Apr-2005 06:39 PM
Tree of the Day - Fri March 25, 2005 TreeBay Tree of the Day 6 25-Mar-2005 05:35 PM


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:19 PM.


Powered by: v Bulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8 ver 3.0.3
All content, including text, images, logo and treesmilies ©2001-2005 bonsaiTALK, TreeBay.com, All rights reserved.