|
bonsaiTALK Master Chief
Join Date: Mar-2005
Location: Victoria
Country: Australia
Posts: 1,091
|
David i like what you have in mind and chose pic. no.2 as the way i would have gone. I feel the removal of the 'child' has given the plum the freedom of movement it needed. I understand the desire by some to retain as much foliage as poss. but if less is more then this is a good example. We can get too caught up focussing on one feature of a tree, this can be distracting and confusing. However i do respect the other views people have given,this is why we gather together on this great site.
Ash
__________________
Better to procrastinate than lose sight of the objective by rash deeds.
http://bonsaivaultforum.freeforums.org
|