bwaynef

Here is my line of thinking throughout this thread:

I read your article and thought you'd touched on the basics of selection. I realized that I would probably have added something to it had I written it (and arguably, left some stuff out, be it important or not. We're different so our writing would be too).

I saw that you wanted discussion on the topic more than (necessarily) about the article (reply #7). I offered a suggestion, though poorly worded apparently, and in reference to your article. As a result of my suggestion, it seemed that you defended not adding a "jot or tittle" to your article for reasons having to do with length.

I thought that you wanted a discussion on the subject. I think the reason we haven't had one has little to do with this post being moved to the Articles section.

WF

__________________
----------------------------------
© 2004 - present bwaynef